Writ Was Dismissed as No Interference Was Required at This Stage and Assessee Was Directed to File Reply to SCN | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 31 January, 2025
Case Details: Vaishan Traders IV v. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes - [2025] 170 taxmann.com 489 (Karnataka)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- C.M. Poonacha, J.
-
Vishwanath Hegde & Smt. Tanuja Hegde, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
Shivaprabhu Hiremath, AGA for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a registered dealer. Pursuant to a search conducted under Section 67(2) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax (KGST) Act, 2017, an order of seizure was issued and a communication was also issued where under the petitioner was notified of the discrepancies that had been noticed by the department upon verification of the documents produced by the petitioner.
The petitioner filed writ petition and contended that the procedure under Section 64(2) of the KGST Act had been undertaken without Section 67(1) of the KGST Act having been complied.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner had merely been afforded an opportunity of hearing after the department had set out the discrepancies as noticed by them. It was open to the petitioner to respond to the discrepancies and take all contentions permissible under law including the contentions with regard to Section 67(1) of the KGST Act. Therefore, the Court held that no interference was required at this stage.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied