Writ Petition Challenging NPA Status Dismissed as Petitioner Breached Sanction Letter by Diverting Sale Proceeds
- Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 12 September, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Sharma Enterprises v. Banking Ombudsman - [2024] 166 taxmann.com 223 (HC-Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Dharmesh Sharma, J
- Shekhar Nanavaty, Shubham Dhyani & Ms Shikha Gupta, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Abhinav Sharma, Dipan Sethi, Advs. & Gyanendra Agrawal, Adv. for Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the petitioner, proprietorship concern and MSME availed credit facilities from the respondent bank in terms of the sanction letter, which stated that the company i.e. the petitioner would deal exclusively with the bank and would not open any account in any other bank without their permission and also party had to route sale proceeds through said bank’s account only.
However, the petitioner diverted its sale proceeds and routed the same through Baroda Bank, wherein the petitioner had an account. The Respondent bank declared the petitioner’s account NPA.
The petitioner instituted a complaint with the Banking Ombudsman, raising a grievance that its account was declared as NPA contrary to the Notification dated 1-7-2015 and without following the prescribed procedure. However, the Ombudsman said the complaint was rejected.
The petitioner filed the instant writ petition praying for some relief, i.e., to issue an appropriate writ, thereby quashing the order passed by the Ombudsman as it was passed without assigning any reason.
It was noted that the petitioner did not come clean since after sanction/credit facilities by the respondent bank, as per the statement of account of the petitioner, a credit amount was routed by the petitioner and credited in account with Baroda Bank, instead of being credited to account of respondent bank.
High Court Held
The High Court held that since the petitioner abused the process of law as he was in wanton breach of the sanction letter, it was not entitled to any relief and, thus, the instant writ petition was to be dismissed with token costs.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
