WhatsApp’s Updated Privacy Policy Mandating Data Sharing for Non-Service Purposes Violates Section 4

  • Blog|News|Competition Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 9 December, 2024

WhatsApp's Data-Sharing Policy

Case Details: Updated Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for WhatsApp Users, In re - [2024] 168 taxmann.com 482 (CCI)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Ms Ravneet Kaur, Chairperson, Anil Agrawal & Deepak Anurag, Member
  • Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv., Yaman VermaMs Aisha KhanAniket GhoshMs Parinita KareMs Bani BrarMs Tahira Kathpalia and Ms Supritha Prodaturi, Advs. RajShekhar Rao, Sr. Adv. Naval ChopraMs Krithika RameshMs Meherunnisa A. JaitleyRajarshi RoyMs Nitika Dwivedi, Advs., Ms Ruth ChenRahul Satyan, Representatives of Meta.
  • Tejas KariaAatmik JainAakash KumbhatShashank Mishra, Advs. Vivek PandeySasthibrata PandaMs Shreya KapoorMs Biyanka Bhatia, Advs. for all Appearing Parties.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, WhatsApp had updated its privacy policy and terms of service for WhatsApp users. It was inter alia reported that the new policy made it mandatory for users to accept terms and conditions in order to retain their WhatsApp account information and provided as to how it would share personalised user information with Facebook (later renamed as Meta) and its subsidiaries.

The Commission, decided to take suo-motu cognisance of the matter. It was noted that WhatsApp was dominant in the relevant market for Over The Top (OTT) messaging apps through smartphones in India. Further, users were made to accept the 2021 Update, which mandated the sharing of data for purposes other than providing WhatsApp services, without offering any choice to opt out of the same. This imposition disregards the legitimate expectations of users to decide how their data will be collected and used.

CCI Held

The CCI observed that by compelling all users to accept data-sharing conditions, WhatsApp reduces the level of privacy (an important non-price parameter of competition in digital markets) that users expect, thus diminishing consumer welfare. This would result in increasing entry barriers for rivals and thus potentially lead to their exclusion from the market.

The CCI held that the impugned conduct of data-sharing by WhatsApp with Facebook apparently amounted to the degradation of non-price parameters of competition, ultimately constituting an abuse of market power.

Further, the CCI held that WhatsApp had prima facie contravened the provisions of section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, through its exploitative and exclusionary conduct in the garb of the policy update. Accordingly, in terms of provisions of Section 27(a) of the Act, WhatsApp was directed to cease and desist from indulging in such practices, which had been found to violate the provisions of the Act.

List of Cases Referred to

  • Legislation expressly or impliedly provides for retrospective application (In Zile Singh v. State of Haryana (2004) 8 SCC 1 (para 250)
  • Videocon International Limited v. SEBI (2015) 4 SCC 33 (para 250).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied