Typographical Error in Tax Period Mentioned in Order Can Be Challenged by Filing an Appeal Under CGST Act | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 October, 2024
Case Details: Prasad Explosive & Chemicals v. Principal Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax & Central Excise - [2024] 166 taxmann.com 698 (Jharkhand)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Sujit Narayan Prasad, ACTG. CJ. & Arun Kumar Rai, J.
-
Deepak Kr. Sinha, Adv. for the Petitioner.
-
Parth S.A. Swaroop Pati, Sr. SC, CGST for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner received a show cause notice and the tax period was mentioned as July 2017 to March 2018. It filed writ petition and contended that in show cause notice, tax period was mentioned as July 2017 to March 2018 but while adjudicating issue, tax period had been referred as 2017-18 and 2018-19.The department filed preliminary objection regarding maintainability of writ petition on ground of availability of alternative remedy of appeal.
High Court Held
The High Court noted that the typographical error had cropped up in impugned order. The Court also noted that as per the Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, the appeal can be filed against the order. Therefore, the Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty to file appeal within a period of two weeks. The Court also directed that appellate authority will decide the appeal if the appeal is in order, within a period of six weeks by taking decision in accordance with law.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied