Telecom Towers Are Movable Properties as They Do Not Meet the Test of Permanency and ITC on Same Cannot Be Denied | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 21 December, 2024
Case Details: Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST Appeals-1, Delhi - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 390 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Yashwant Varma & Girish Kathpalia, JJ.
- Sujit Ghosh, Sr. Adv., Kumar Visalaksh, Udit Jain, Ms Akansha Dikshit, V. Lakshmikumaran, Yogendra Aldak & Sumit Khadaria, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Anurag Ojha, SSC, Subham Kumar, Dipak Raj, Kumar Abhishek, Ms Ira Singh, Aryan Dhaka, Anurag Sahay, Rohit Kumar, Advs., Mukul Singh, CGSC, Ms Avshreya Pratap Singh, SPC & Abhigyan Siddhant, GP for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the writ petition was filed to challenge the proceedings under GST in which the department raised demand of tax along with interest and penalty on the ground that input tax credit was denied on inputs and input services used for setting up passive infrastructure i.e. telecommunication towers. It was contended that telecommunication towers would not fall within ambit of Section 17(5)(d) and hence, denial of input tax credit would not sustain.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the Supreme Court in case of Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise [2024] 168 taxmann.com 489 has conclusively held that telecommunication towers cannot be construed as immovable property. The Court further noted that telecommunication towers would not qualify as immovable property as they neither qualify test of permanency nor can be said to be attached to earth. The mobile towers can be dismantled and moved and they were never erected with an intent of conferring permanency. Their placement on concrete bases was only to enable those towers to overcome vagaries of nature. Thus, the denial of input tax credit on telecommunication towers would not sustain.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Commissioner of Central Excise v. Solid and Correct Engineering Works [2010] 5 SCC 122 (para 16)
- Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12302 (para 19)
- Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise [2024] 168 taxmann.com 489 (SC) (para 19) followed.
List of Cases Referred to
- Bharti Airtel Ltd v. CCE 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3374 (para 6)
- Vodafone Mobile Services Limited v. CST 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12302 (para 6)
- CCE v. Solid and Correct Engineering Works & Others (2010) 5 SCC 122 (para 15).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied