Tax Demand Could Not Be Confirmed Without Providing Opportunity of Personal Hearing to Assessee | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 7 May, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Sanjai Gandhi v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (ST) - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 266 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
- Ms Aparna Nandakumar for the Petitioner.
- V. Prashanth Kiran, Government Advocate (T) for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in business of supplying water purifiers and R.O. systems and providing services in relation thereto. The department issued notice to petitioner for discrepancies in Form GSTR-3B and GSTR-2B and it submitted a detailed explanation. However, the demand was confirmed without providing an opportunity of being heard and it filed writ petition against the same.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the confirmed tax demand related to discrepancies between the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed by the petitioner in Form GSTR-3B on comparison with the GSTR-2B. Such tax demand could not have been confirmed without the petitioner being heard.
Therefore, it was held that the impugned order was to be set aside on condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand and the petitioner would be permitted to submit a reply to show cause notice. The Court also directed the department to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh order.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
