Show Cause Notice During Advance Ruling Application Does Not Prevent Decision on Merits | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 26 December, 2024
Case Details: General Motors India (P.) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 483 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
-
Darius Shroff, Sr. Adv., Mahir Chablani & Ms Dimpal Jangid, for the Petitioner.
-
Ms Shrutin Vyas, Addl. GP & Ms P. N. Diwan, AGP for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee filed an application for advance ruling on 20-12-2023. During the pendency of the application, the authority issued pre-show cause notice under section 73(5) of the MGST Act. The assessee filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court to direct the authority to decide the application for advance ruling on the taxability of the sale of land and buildings carried out pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) on merits.
High Court Held
The High Court noted that the application seeking advance ruling was filed when the question raised in the application was not already pending or decided in any proceedings in the case of the assessee under any provisions of the CGST/SGST Act. The phrase ‘already pending’ would mean and imply that it is pending on the date of filing the application seeking an advance ruling.
Therefore, the Court held that the subsequent issue of pre-show cause notice was not a bar for the authority to decide the application seeking advance ruling on merits.
List of Cases Reviewed
- DRI (Headquarters) v. Spraytec India Ltd (2023) 4 Centax 211 (Del)
- Srico Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Telangana State Authority for Advance Ruling & Anr. 2022 106 GSTR 247, relied on.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied