Sec. 54F Relief Available on Sale of Depreciable Long-Term Capital Asset Taxable u/s 50 | ITAT
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 July, 2024
Case Details: Sonia Pathak Khanna vs. Income Tax Officer - [2024] 164 taxmann.com 607 (Mumbai-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Prashant Maharishi, Accountant Member
- K. Gopal, AR for the Appellant.
- R.R. Makwana, DR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee, a fashion designer, earned income from manufacturing garments and interest income. During the relevant assessment year, the assessee sold an industrial gala on which she claimed depreciation in earlier years. The capital gain arising on the sale of depreciable asset was utilized by the assessee in purchasing a house property. While furnishing the return of income, the assessee claimed exemption under Section 54F of the Act.
Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer (AO) contended that the gain on the sale of depreciable assets was short-term capital gain and denied the exemption under Section 54F. The assessee contended that the benefit of Section 54F is available to the assessee since the property sold was held for more than 36 months and is a long-term capital asset.
However, AO rejected the assessee’s claim. On appeal, CIT(A) confirmed the order of AO and the matter reached before the Mumbai Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that section 54F provides that if the assessee, being an individual or HUF, has any long-term capital gains, not to include any gains arising from the transfer of a long-term capital asset if, within a period of one year before or two years after the date on which the transfer took place, he purchased a residential house. The capital gain so arose is granted as exemption in proportion to net consideration to the amount of investment in new house property.
Section 50 determines the gain arising from any asset as short-term capital gain. Thus, it characterizes the gain and not the capital asset. Undoubtedly, the capital gain earned by the assessee under section 50 may be chargeable to tax as short-term capital gain; however, as the building was held for more than 36 months, the transfer of long-term capital asset has resulted in the such gain.
Thus, the deeming fiction under section 50 may be restricted to the chargeability of gain as short-term capital gain but the asset remains a long-term capital asset and does not become a short-term capital asset by virtue of section 50.
Therefore, the Commissioner (Appeals) should have granted the claim of the assessee under section 54F. Accordingly, the issue was restored back to the file of the AO to compute the income of the assessee considering the provisions of section 41(2) and section 50C, and thereafter from the capital gain, allow the claim of the assessee under section 54F, if the other conditions are satisfied.
List of Cases Reviewed
- CIT v. Ace Builders Private Limited 281 ITR 210, CIT v. V.S. Dempo Co Ltd. in 387 ITR 354 (Para 23) followed.
- CIT v. Shakthi Metal Depot 333 ITR 492 (Para 24) distinguished.
List of Cases Referred to
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT [2006] 157 Taxman 1/284 ITR 323 (SC) (para 12)
- CIT v. Sakthi Metal Depot [2010] 189 Taxman 329/[2011] 333 ITR 492 (Kerala) (para 14)
- CIT v. ACE Builders (P.) Ltd. [2005] 144 Taxman 855/[2006] 281 ITR 210 (Bombay) (para 15)
- CIT v. V.S. Dempo Company Ltd. [2016] 74 taxmann.com 15/242 Taxman 434/387 ITR 354 (SC) (para 15).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied