Reopening Notice Issued to Petitioner for AY 2014-15 Quashed as IT Dept. Failed to Claim Escaped Income During CIRP | HC
- News|Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 August, 2024
Case Details: Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax. - [2024] 165 taxmann.com 641 (HC-Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Yashwant Varma & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Ms Kavita Jha & Himanshu Aggarwal, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Abhishek Maratha, SSC, Parth Semiwal, Apoorv Agarwal, JSCs, Ms Nupur Sharma, Manav Goyal, Gaurav Singh, Ms Divya Verma & Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the Petitioner Company, involved in steel manufacturing and trading, faced a financial creditor’s application under Section 7 of the IBC, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and a moratorium.
Thereafter, the NCLT approved a Resolution Plan submitted by the SRA. Despite this approval, the petitioner received a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
The petitioner filed an instant writ petition challenging the notice issued by Respondent No.1, the Commissioner of Income Tax Department, under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
It was noted that the respondents had not questioned the validity of the Resolution Plan at any stage. It was further noted that the resolution plan approved by the NCLT in respect of the petitioner company, Income Tax Deptt. was clearly constrained from submitting any claims during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) since, at that time, assessment proceedings were yet to be concluded, and reassessment proceedings in respect of escaped income couldn’t be initiated.
High Court Held
The High Court held that it was not the case of the respondent that the NCLT had been moved for purposes of recall of its order approving the Resolution Plan, and it was also not their case that the Resolution Plan, which effectively closes any claim or demand against the petitioner should be set aside. Therefore, the impugned notice issued under section 148 for the relevant assessment year was to be quashed and set aside.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority 2024 SCC OnLine SC 122 (para 19)
- State Tax Officer v. Rainbow Papers Ltd. (2023) 9 SCC 545 (para 21) distinguished
- M Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. National Faceless Assessment Centre and Anr 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2276
- Sree Metaliks Limited v. Additional Director General and Ors. 2023 SSC OnLine Del 941
- Rishi Ganga Power Corporation Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6994 (para 22) followed
List of Cases Referred to
- M Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. National Faceless Assessment Centre and Anr 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2276 (para 4)
- Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company (2021) 9 SCC 657 (para 5)
- Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta &Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 531 (para 5)
- Rishi Ganga Power Corporation Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6994 (para 5)
- Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta &Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 531 (para 5)
- State Tax Officer v. Rainbow Papers Ltd. (2023) 9 SCC 545 (para 18)
- Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority 2024 SCC OnLine SC 122.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied