Registration to be Treated as Cancelled From Date of First Application Since Assessee Didn’t Want to Continue Business | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 May, 2024
Case Details: Asian Traders v. Principal Commissioner of Department of Trade and Taxes - [2024] 162 taxmann.com 171 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sanjeev Sachdeva & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Pranay Jain, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC & Ms Samridhi Vats, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in the business of trading of polymers and ethylene. It filed application for cancellation of GST registration on 30.05.2023 on the ground of closure of business. However, the said application was rejected by an order dated 07.12.2023. Thereafter, it again applied for cancellation of the GST registration on 14.12.2023 on the ground of closure of business and the said application was also rejected.
It filed writ petition against the rejection of application and contended that the application was rejected by merely mentioning that it was rejected in accordance with the provisions of the CGST Act since reply wasn’t satisfactory and order did not give any particulars or details.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the department did not give any specific reasons for rejection. The mere cancellation of registration does not preclude the department from taking any action in accordance with law for recovery of any tax, penalty or fine that may be due.
In the instant case, no such ground was taken by department. Therefore, it was held that the registration of petitioner was to be treated as cancelled with effect from 30.05.2023 i.e., date when petitioner first filed application seeking cancellation of GST registration and the department was not precluded from taking any steps for recovery of any tax, penalty or interest that may be due.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied