Rectification Application Can’t Be Rejected Without Disclosing Any Reason or Providing Hearing Opportunity | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 September, 2024
Case Details: Orissa Stevedores Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of CT and GST - [2024] 165 taxmann.com 825 (Orissa)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Arindam Sinha & M.S. Sahoo, J.J.
- J. Sahoo, Sr. Adv., Mrs Kajal Sahoo, Adv., for the petitioner.
- S. Mishra, Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner applied for rectification of an order passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act. The rectification application was rejected by the Deputy Commissioner without providing any reasons or an opportunity for a hearing. The petitioner argued that under Section 161 of the Central GST Act, 2017, an opportunity of hearing must be given where the rectification adversely affects any person.
High Court Held
The High Court noted that the impugned order rejecting the rectification did not disclose any reasons for the rejection. Under Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017, if rectification adversely affects any person, the affected party is required to be provided an opportunity of hearing. Since the petitioner argued that the original order adversely affected them, the third proviso to Section 161 applied, and the petitioner should have been given a hearing.
Therefore, the High Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the rectification application and directed the authority to deal with the rectification application on restoration in accordance with the law.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied