Plea for Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal Rejected as Appellant Failed to Appear Before AA Despite Serving of Notice | Appellate Tribunal

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 27 June, 2024

Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal

Case Details: Sciknow Techno Solutions Ltd. v. Dinesh Kumar Gupta (Liquidator of Jarvis Infratech (P.) Ltd.) - [2024] 163 taxmann.com 702 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson & Barun Mitra, Technical Member
  • Gaurav MitraMs Smiti VermaMs Beleena Biju, Advocates for the Appellant.
  • Govind BhardwajMs Mumal JainPradeep ShuklaVivek SinhaVivek MalikShubham Barara, Advocates for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, a liquidation order was issued against the corporate debtor, and a respondent (i.e., the liquidator) was appointed. The liquidator filed an application under section 43 of the IBC before the NCLT seeking directions regarding certain financial transactions categorized as preferential, executed by corporate debtor’s promoters, directors, and management.

Despite being served notice, the appellant (i.e. a suspended director) did not appear before the NCLT, leading to ex-parte proceedings. The NCLT allowed the liquidator’s application and directed the reversal of transactions favouring the corporate debtor.

Thereafter, the appellant filed an instant appeal and sought to condone the delay in filing an instant appeal, claiming that they received the order on 08.01.2023 via a letter dated 29.12.2022 and filed an appeal on 22.02.2023. Thus, the delay was only 14 days beyond the limitation period and should be excused.

It was noted that the appellant did not appear before the NCLT despite service of notice. Hence, it would be treated as served, and the appellant could not say that the order was ex-parte. The limitation to file an appeal would only begin when he had knowledge of the order.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that the ground taken in the delay condonation application that the appellant came to know about the order when he received the letter from the Liquidator on 08.01.2023 was unfounded and not supported by any material. In contrast, the Liquidator, in its reply, had brought material on record that indicated that the Liquidator sent the order on 04.01.2023 by email to the appellant.

Further, the NCLAT held that since there was no ground to allow the delay condonation application, the delay condonation application was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • Noble Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Jarvis Infratech (P.) Ltd. [2024] 163 taxmann.com 701 (NCLT -New Delhi) [para 15] affirmed [See Annex].

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied