Petitioner’s GST Registration Was Suspended as Firm Was Found Locked During GSTI Visit | HC Directed Competent Authority to Decide the Matter
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 May, 2024
Case Details: Balaji Trading Co. v. Commissioner - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 727 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sanjeev Sachdeva & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Shivender Kumar Sharma & Urooj Choudhary, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC, Ms Shaguftha Hameed & Ms Samridhi Vats, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a proprietor of a firm. The department issued a show cause notice to petitioner to show cause as to why GST registration be not cancelled on ground that firm was found locked at time of visit of GSTI and petitioner failed to respond properly to phone call made by GSTI.
It filed writ petition to challenge the SCN and contended that it had filed a detailed reply to the said show cause notice.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner had filed a detailed reply to the said show cause notice. However, the said reply was not considered and the GST registration of the petitioner had been suspended and remained in suspension. Therefore, it was held that the Adjudicating Authority was directed to decide the SCN in accordance with law within a period of two weeks after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to petitioner.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied