Personal Guarantor’s Acknowledgment of Default Justifies Creditor’s Sec. 95 Plea for Insolvency Process Initiation | NCLT
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 January, 2025
Case Details: State Bank of India vs. Hemant Bohra - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 664 (NCLT-Jaipur)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Deep Chandra Joshi, Judicial Member & Rajeev Mehrotra, Technical Member
-
Abhishek Devgan & Vishal Hirawat, Advs. for the Applicant.
-
Anju Jain & Hitesh Sachar, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, Personal guarantor had provided his personal guarantee to secure entire credit facilities availed by the corporate debtor. Subsequently, the corporate debtor defaulted on its credit facility repayment, leading to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Subsequently, creditor through Resolution Professional invoked personal guarantee of guarantor by filing application under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and sought initiation of insolvency resolution process against personal guarantor.
Later, it was noted that personal guarantor had itself acknowledged its personal guarantee and default in repayment of loan.
NCLT Held
The NCLT observed that since non-payment of its liability by corporate debtor led to invocation of personal guarantee and thereby, default of personal guarantor, instant application filed under section 95 was a separate transaction from that of application filed under section 7 against corporate guarantor.
Since parameters laid down under provisions of law were met with, the NCLT held that the application filed by creditor against the initiation of Individual Insolvency Resolution Process of personal guarantor was to be admitted.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied