Penalty Order Passed Without Hearing to Be Set Aside Since E-way Bill Was Downloaded Prior to Interception of Vehicle | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 May, 2024
Case Details: Mid Town Associates v. Additional Commissioner - [2024] 162 taxmann.com 736 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Shekhar B. Saraf, J.
- Suyash Agrawal, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Arvind Kumar Mishra, Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a registered dealer and it received a notice for non-availability of e-way bill at the time of interception of goods. The department had detained the truck on the ground of presumption that the goods were being transported with the intention to evade tax due to the non-production of E-Way Bill and imposed penalty.
It filed appeal against the penalty order but the appeal was rejected. It filed writ petition against the order and contended that the goods were being transported with E-way bill and no opportunity of hearing was provided before passing the penalty order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner had downloaded the e-way bill for the goods in question before the interception of goods. The penalty order was passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and it was a gross violation of the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the Court held that the imposition of penalty was not justified and the penalty order was liable to be set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied