Order Was Set Aside as It Did Not Provide Adequate Reasons for Rejecting the Assessee’s Detailed Reply to the SCN | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 18 December, 2024
Case Details: Rajdhani Trading Co. v. Union of India - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 218 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Yashwant Varma & Dharmesh Sharma, JJ.
-
Gaurav Gupta & Deepanshu Saini, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
Ms Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC, Chandandeep Singh, Sandeep Singh Somaria, Akhil Gupta, Dipak Raj, Shubham Kumar, Mayank Kamra, Advs., Anurag Ojha, SSC, & Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, a registered person, filed a detailed reply to the notice issued under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The reply was not accepted by the proper officer, and the demand was confirmed. The petitioner filed a writ petition to the Delhi High Court contending that the order did not provide any adequate reasons for rejecting the petitioner’s detailed reply to the show-cause notice (SCN).
High Court Held
The Delhi High Court noted that the order merely reiterated procedural steps (issuance of SCN, invitation for reply) without discussing or analyzing the petitioner’s reply. Such a non-speaking order violates the principles of natural justice as the proper officer did not fulfill its duty to record reasons for its conclusions. Therefore, the said order was to be set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied