Order to Be Set Aside as SCN Was Uploaded on GST Portal Without Direct Communication to Assessee | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 15 March, 2025
Case Details: Tvl.Sai Ram Packaging vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) - [2025] 172 taxmann.com 178 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Mohammed Shaffiq, J.
-
J. Poojesh, for the Petitioner.
-
G. Nanmaran, Special Government Pleader for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, engaged in the wholesale and retail business of cartons and boxes, was subjected to an assessment order under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, for allegedly availing excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to purchases from cancelled dealers, return defaulters, and reconciliation discrepancies. The petitioner contended that the assessment order was issued without proper service of a Show Cause Notice (SCN), as it was merely uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication, violating natural justice principles. Citing similar cases where courts had remanded matters upon partial tax deposit, the petitioner expressed willingness to pay 25% of the disputed tax and sought an opportunity to submit objections.
High Court Held
The High Court set aside the assessment order, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, with any prior payments adjusted. The order was treated as a Show Cause Notice, allowing the petitioner to submit objections with supporting documents. The tax authorities were directed to reconsider the matter and pass a fresh order after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Non-compliance with the payment or submission timelines would result in the restoration of the assessment order, while any ongoing recovery proceedings, including bank attachments, would be withdrawn upon compliance.
List of Cases Reviewed
- M/s.K.Balakrishnan, Balu Cables v. O/o. the Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise in W.P. (MD)No.11924 of 2024 dated 10.06.2024 – (para 4) followed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied