Order to Be Set Aside as Only Summary Notice Was Issued Without Issuing Proper and Prior SCN | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 March, 2025
Case Details: Maverick Technologies vs. State of Assam - [2025] 172 taxmann.com 522 (Gauhati)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Manish Choudhury, J.
-
R S Mishra, A K Gupta, Ms M Nirola, R K Mahanta for the Petitioner.
-
B. Choudhury, for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee challenged the order issued under Section 73 of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (AGST Act) on the ground that no proper and prior show cause notice (SCN), as mandated under Section 73(1), was issued. Instead, the department merely issued an attachment to the determination of tax under Section 73(3) along with a summary of the SCN in Form GST DRC-01. The assessee contended that such issuance was not in compliance with Section 73(1) of the AGST Act and Rule 142(1) of the AGST Rules. Consequently, the assessee sought to set aside the impugned order on the basis that the statutory requirement of serving a valid SCN before adjudication was not met.
High Court Held
The Hon’ble High Court held that the non-issuance of a proper and prior SCN and the mere issuance of a summary SCN along with an attachment to the determination of tax do not satisfy the mandatory requirements of Section 73(1) of the AGST Act and Rule 142(1) of the AGST Rules. The court emphasized that compliance with the procedural safeguards laid down in sub-sections (1) to (8) and (10) to (11) of Section 73, along with sub-rule (1) of Rule 142, is a condition precedent for rendering an order under Section 73(9) valid. In the absence of a duly issued SCN, the adjudication process was vitiated, rendering the impugned order legally unsustainable. Accordingly, the court decided in favour of the assessee and set aside the impugned order.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Construction Catalysers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Assam & Ors., W.P.[C] No. 3912/2024, dated 26-9-2024, followed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied