Order to Be Set Aside as Assessee’s Request for a Personal Hearing Was Not Considered by Adjudicating Authority | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 25 February, 2025
Case Details: JC Valvulas India (P.) Ltd. vs. Commercial Tax Officer - [2025] 171 taxmann.com 404 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Mohammed Shaffiq, J.
-
S. Karunamoorthy for the Petitioner.
-
Ms Amrita Dinakaran, Govt. Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Petitioner was engaged in the business of manufacturing and supply of valves. The petitioner was registered dealer under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant assessment period certain discrepancies were identified in the petitioner’s GST returns, relating to reversal of input tax credit (‘ITC’), ineligible ITC, and ITC claimed from cancelled dealers and tax non payers. A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner in Form GST DRC-01.
In response, the petitioner filed a reply seeking time to furnish some more documents and also requested a personal hearing. However, the order was passed without considering the request for personal hearing. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner filed a writ petition to the Madras High Court.
High Court Held
The Madras High Court held that the impugned order suffered from the violation of the principles of natural justice and was also contrary to the mandate contained in Section 75(4) of the CGST Act. The matter was remitted to the authority for passing a fresh order after considering the request for a personal hearing.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied