Order to Be Set Aside as Assessee’s Explanation for Mismatch in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B Was Dismissed Without Proper Reasoning | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 5 April, 2025
Case Details: Masany Construction Equipment (P.) Ltd. vs. State Tax Officer - [2025] 172 taxmann.com 661 (Kerala)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Bechu Kurian Thomas, J.
-
P. Raghunathan, Premjit Nagendran, M. Shylaja, Rishal. K, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
P.R. Sreejith, Adv. & Smt. Dr. Thushara James, Senior Government Pleader for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Revenue issued a show cause notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, alleging a mismatch between the assessee’s GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for Financial Year 2019-2020. The assessee explained that the discrepancy arose due to an entry error in GSTR-1, later corrected in GSTR-3B, with no tax liability as sufficient ITC was available. However, the reply was summarily rejected as ‘not convincing and non-explanatory’ leading to an adverse order, which the assessee challenged before the High Court on grounds of violation of natural justice.
High Court Held
The Hon’ble High Court held that dismissing a reply with a mere sentence does not constitute a speaking order. The officer was obligated to verify the bona fides of the discrepancy and examine relevant records. The failure to provide proper reasoning, despite an opportunity for a hearing, rendered the order unsustainable. Accordingly, the order was set aside, and the matter remanded for reconsideration with a fresh opportunity of hearing.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied