Order Rejecting Refund to Be Set Aside as Assessee Was Eligible for Refund of Compensation Cess Paid on Goods Exported | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 February, 2025
Case Details: Crystal Overseas vs. Union of India - [2025] 171 taxmann.com 233 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Somasekhar Sundaresan & B.P. Colabawalla, JJ.
-
Rahul C. Thakar & C. B. Thakar, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
Siddharth Chandrashekhar & Saket R. Ketkar, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee, having its principal place of business in Maharashtra, was engaged in the export of beverages. The purchases were made on payment of GST and Compensation Cess. Since the export qualified as a zero-rated supply, the assessee applied for a refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC), including Compensation Cess. A show cause notice was issued proposing to disallow the refund. In response, the assessee submitted a reply. However, the adjudicating authority, while passing the refund order, granted a refund only for CGST and SGST, denying the refund of Compensation Cess. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the appellate authority, which was rejected on the grounds that ‘input tax’ as defined under Section 2(62) of the CGST Act, 2017 does not include Compensation Cess. Consequently, the assessee filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the denial.
High Court Held
The Hon’ble High Court held that the issue was squarely covered by Circular No. 1/1/2017-Compensation Cess, dated 26-07-2017, which explicitly allows an exporter to claim a refund of Compensation Cess paid on exported goods. Accordingly, the impugned orders rejecting the refund claim were quashed and set aside. The respondents were directed to grant the refund of Compensation Cess along with interest under Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017 within a period of four weeks.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied