[Opinion] To Appeal or Not to Appeal | CBIC Sets Limits for GST Appeals by Department
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 3 July, 2024
Ajay Kumar Maggidi – [2024] 164 taxmann.com 48 (Article)
1. Background
In pursuance of 53rd GST Council recommendations, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has recently issued Circular No. 207/1/2024-GST dated 26-June-2024, setting up new monetary limits for the Department’s filing of appeals before the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), High Courts, and the Supreme Court. This move is aimed to minimize government litigation and enhance the efficiency of judicial resource allocation.
2. Objectives of Government
- The aim is to optimum the utilization of judicial resources and expedite the resolution of pending cases.
- It underscores the importance of prudent litigation practices by establishing thresholds for filing appeals in Revenue matters.
- The appeals should not be pursued when the amount involved is below a specified monetary limit set by Revenue authorities.
- Discourage filing appeals in cases where established precedents from Tribunals and High Courts have settled the matter and have not been contested in the Supreme Court.
3. Monetary Limits for Filing Appeals
Judicial Body | Monetary Limit |
GSTAT | Rs. 20,00,000 |
High Court | Rs. 1,00,00,000 |
Supreme Court | Rs. 2,00,00,000 |
Section 120 of the CGST Act empowers CBIC to fix the monetary limits for appeals by the authorities. It says as follows:
When GST officers can not appeal certain decisions.
- The tax authority (Board) can set minimum amounts for appeals. This means if the tax issue involves a smaller amount, the tax office can’t appeal the decision.
- If the tax office doesn’t appeal because of the limit, they can still appeal other cases with similar issues, even if the amounts are bigger.
- Just because the tax office doesn’t appeal due to the limit, it doesn’t mean they agree with the decision.
- If a case goes to court anyway, the judge will take into account why the tax office didn’t appeal in the first place (because of the limit).
Click Here To Read The Full Article
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied