No Requirement of Giving Personal Hearing Before Issuing Sec. 61 Notice | HC Dismissed Writ Petition
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 September, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Savitri Tech and Infra Works (P.) Ltd. v. State of U.P. - [2024] 165 taxmann.com 800 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Mrs Sangeeta Chandra & Shree Prakash Singh, JJ.
-
Ayush Shukla for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a private limited company. A notice was issued to petitioner under Section 61 of GST Act on ground of mismatch in GSTR but it did not submit reply. Thereafter, the department issued impugned notice under Section 73(1) of CGST Act and it moved an adjournment application and more time was requested to submit a reply and also for granting opportunity of personal hearing.
However, the impugned order was passed. It filed writ petition against the demand order and contended that the notice was in violation of principles of natural justice as no personal hearing was provided.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that as per Section 61 of CGST Act, 2017, there is no requirement of giving personal hearing and only a reply is sought from assessee. In the instant case, the petitioner did not submit any reply to the show cause notice and the adjournment application would have been entertained in case the petitioner would have given a written reply to the show cause notice and then asked for adjournment of personal hearing.
Therefore, it was held that the law as settled in case of Mohan Agencies v. State of U.P. & Anr. [2023] 126 taxmann.com 327 (Allahabad) was inapplicable in facts of the instant case and the writ petition was to be dismissed.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Mohan Agencies v. State of U.P. & Anr., Writ Tax No. 58 of 2023, dated 13-2-2023, distinguished.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
