No Denial of Sec. 11 Exemption if Trust’s Activities Were Unchanged and Books Audited Subsequently | ITAT
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 January, 2025
Case Details: Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Mazdoor Welfare Trust - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 733 (Chennai-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Manu Kumar Giri, Judicial Member & S.R. Raghunathan, Accountant Member
-
Nilay Baran Som, CIT for the Appellant.
-
G. Baskar, Adv., for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee-trust was carrying on activities of education. The assessee filed its return claiming exemption under section 11 for the relevant year. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied exemption on the ground that books of account of the earlier two assessment years, 2005-06 and 2006-07, were not audited. The matter reached the Chennai Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that it was an admitted fact that the assessee was a trust registered under section 12A and carrying on the activities of education. The AO had denied exemption under section 11 because the books of account of the earlier two assessment years were not audited, and the opening balances for the impugned year were taken as incomplete.
The Commissioner (Appeals) decided the issue in favour of the assessee by allowing the exemption to the trust under section 11 because the accounts for the earlier years were later audited, and the assessee also filed the returns for the said years. Thus, the assessee’s appeal was allowed with direction to the AO to verify and allow the disallowed expenses.
Further, the assessee furnished all the details of the hostel building rent along with ledger extracts to the Commissioner (Appeals), who was referred to the AO for a remand report. The AO did not give adverse remarks to the Commissioner (Appeals).
Since there was no change in the activities of the trust and the assessee continued to enjoy exemption under section 11 for the earlier assessment years, there was no fault in the decision to allow an exemption under section 11 to the assessee by the Commissioner (Appeals) for the relevant assessment year.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied