No Abuse of Dominance by ‘Astrotalk’ Due to the Presence of Several Other Competing Online Astrology Platforms | CCI

  • Blog|News|Competition Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 19 December, 2024

Abuse of dominance

Case Details: InstaAstro Technology (P.) Ltd. vs. Astrotalk Services (P.) Ltd. - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 312 (CCI)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Ms Ravneet Kaur, Chairperson Anil Agrawal, Ms Sweta Kakkad & Deepak Anurag, Member

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the informant was an App-based platform, offering on-demand astrology services through ‘InstaAstro’, which enabled users to schedule sessions with astrologers over chat/call and provide diversified services such as tarot reading, vastu, vedic astrology, match-making, horoscope reading, etc. Astrotalk was also an online platform as well as an app-based platform, which offered on-demand astrology services similar to ones offered by informant.

Informant filed information alleging contravention of sections 3 and 4 by OP alleging that OP was abusing its dominant position in relevant market of ‘sale of astrology related products and services provided by online platform for selling astrology related solutions in India’ and was poaching informant’s consultants and employees by offering them higher remuneration.

CCI Held

The CCI observed that the allegations primarily fell under purview of contract law. Consultants had freedom to provide their services to any entity as per their discretion and conduct of moving away from one entity to another (to offer services) in lieu of better remuneration, as such could not be examined under realm of Competition Law, more specifically, under provisions of section 3.

Since there existed well entrenched competition in form of several astrology online applications/platforms available in India in the delineated market, OP was not dominant in relevant market.

The CCI held that there existed no prima facie case of contravention of provisions of section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 against OP.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied