Matter Was Remanded as Assessee Was Not Given Hearing Opportunity Due to SCN Sent to Wrong Email ID | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 February, 2025
Case Details: Bhagirath Infra Projects (AP) (P.) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax - [2025] 171 taxmann.com 103 (Andhra Pradesh)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- R. Raghunandan Rao & Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, JJ.
-
A. Sarveswar Rao for the Petitioner.
-
Santhi Chandra, Sr. Standing Counsel & J.U.M.V. Prasad, Central Government Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, engaged in the business of executing road works, bridge construction, and irrigation projects, was issued a show cause notice demanding tax on turnover reported in income tax returns for specific financial years. Subsequently, an assessment order was issued without affording the petitioner a personal hearing. The petitioner contended that the absence of a personal hearing prejudiced his case, particularly in the context of the exemption claimed under a relevant notification. The Revenue asserted that notice had been duly served via email and post. However, it was demonstrated that the email ID used did not belong to the petitioner, and the postal notices were returned unserved. Consequently, the petitioner challenged the assessment before the High Court, seeking relief on grounds of violation of natural justice.
High Court Held
The Hon’ble High Court noted that the impugned assessment order, issued without a validly served notice of personal hearing, violated the principles of natural justice. The Court also observed that procedural fairness necessitates proper service of notice and an opportunity for the petitioner to present his case before an adverse order is passed. Accordingly, the Court set aside the assessment order and directed the Revenue to issue a fresh notice fixing a date for a personal hearing.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied