Matter to Be Remitted Back Since Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity of Personal Hearing to Prove His Claim of ITC | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 April, 2024
Case Details: Unity OOH Media Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy State Tax Officer (Addl. Charge) - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 524 (Kerala)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
-
Tomson T. Emmanuel for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was an assessee under the provisions of the GST Act, 2017 and it had filed GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns for the period July 2017 to March 2018. The department issued notices and the petitioner could not file a reply to the notices issued. In absence of reply to the show cause notices issued and personal hearing, the department passed assessment order and denied certain claim for input tax credit. The petitioner filed writ petition and contended that the impugned order had been passed without hearing and it was not given opportunity of representing the case.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner was not given opportunity of personal hearing to prove his claim of input tax credit. Also, the Court noted that in the case of Diya Agencies (P.) Ltd. v. The State Tax Officer dated 12.09.2023 in WP(C) No. 29769/203 it was held that assessment order with regards to denial of ITC to petitioner was not sustainable, and matter was remanded back to Assessing Officer to give opportunity of hearing to petitioner for its claim for ITC. Therefore, the Court held that the assessment order with regards to denial of input tax credit was not sustainable and the matter was remitted back to the department.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Diya Agencies v. The State Tax Officer [WP(C) No. 29769/203 dated 12.09.2023][Para 4] Followed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied