Issuance and Dropping of Notice Under Section 73 Does Not Prevent Authorities from Initiating Proceedings u/s 74 | HC

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 16 December, 2024

GST Proceedings u/s 74

Case Details: Group M Media India (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 146 (Punjab & Haryana)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Sanjeev Prakash Sharma & Sanjay Vashisth, JJ.
  • Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv., Nikhil GoyalMs Anishka Gupta, Advs. for the Petitioner.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner was issued a notice under section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and after the reply was filed, the proceedings were dropped. However, later, another notice under Section 74 was issued by the State Tax Officer. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the issuance of notice under section 73 and dropping the same would not prevent the authorities from independently initiating proceedings under section 74. The said proposition has also been accepted by the Allahabad High Court in the case of HCL Infotech Ltd.

Further, the notice under section 74 was issued to the petitioner based on the fact that the petitioner had not deposited the tax liability in the Government treasury. The proceedings under section 74 of the Act are comprehensively and completely laid down under the provisions of the Act. Thus, there would be no hindrance of any manner in the disposal of the proceedings.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • HCL Infotech Ltd. v. Commissioner Tax and another [2024 (9) TMI 1644] [Para 10] distinguished.

List of Cases Referred to

  • Raj Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Union of India and others (1997) 6 SCC 81 (para 4)
  • HCL Infotech Ltd. v. Commissioner, Commercial Tax and another 2024 (9) TMI 1644 (para 4).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied