Interest Liability Arises Automatically on Delayed Filing of Returns Even if Payment Made From Credit Ledger | Patna HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 24 April, 2024
Case Details: Sincon Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 616 (Patna)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- K. Vinod Chandran, CJ. & Harish Kumar, J.
- Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Atal Bihari Pandey, Alok Kumar Jha, Mukund Kumar, Akash Kumar, Aditya Raman & Ranjeet Kumar, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Dr Krishna Nandan Singh, ASG, Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC, CGST and CX, Devansh Shankar Singh, JC to ASG & Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, JC to ASG for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner received a notice for the recovery of interest on the belated payment of tax. The interest was charged for the tax paid from the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) for the financial year 2018-19 and order was passed. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner filed a writ petition to the High Court of Patna.
High Court Held
The High Court noted that the payment of tax and furnishing of return have to occur simultaneously. The Court further noted that the input tax credit and the resultant payment of tax from the Electronic Credit Ledger occurs only when a return is furnished. If there is a delay in furnishing of returns then obviously there is a delay in the input tax credit coming into the Electronic Credit Ledger and a resultant payment being made to the Government as tax, interest, penalty or other amounts due under the Act.
Therefore, the claim of the petitioner that the proviso of Section 50(1) mandates a levy of interest only when there is a delayed furnishing of return and debit made and payment effected from the Electronic Cash Ledger was rejected. The Court also held that interest shall be payable on the delay occasioned in the payment of tax and as per section 50(1) interest liability would arise automatically on delayed filing of returns, irrespective of whether payment is made from Electronic Credit Ledger or Electronic Cash Ledger.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Refex Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise in W.P. Nos. 23360 and 23361 of 2019 (Para 28) followed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied