HC Upholds Liquidator’s Suspension for Conflict of Interest and Inflated Billing Practices

  • News|Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 8 July, 2024

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Account & Audit

Classification and Disclosure of Late Payment Interest in Financial Statements

News, Blog, GST & Customs

Appellate Authority Can’t Dismiss an Appeal on Maintainability Grounds If Alternative Remedy Has Been Directed by the Court | HC

Latest from Taxmann

Liquidator’s Suspension

Case Details: Sundaresh Bhat v. Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India - [2024] 164 taxmann.com 147 (HC-Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Subramonium Prasad, J.
  • Ramji Srinivasan, Milanka Chaudhary, Ms Ashly Cherian & Ms Swet Shikha, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Vikas Mehta, Rashi Rampal, Apoorv Khaton & Ankit Vashisht, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the petitioner was appointed as an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) for the corporate debtor. Later, the NCLT directed the corporate debtor to undergo liquidation under section 33(2) of the IBC, with the petitioner acting as Liquidator to perform duties under section 35 of the IBC.

Meanwhile, the petitioner received a notice of inspection regarding liquidation assignment and, thereafter, a Show Cause Notice (SCN) was issued by the respondent-IBBI, alleging the petitioner paid an excess fee to a support service, i.e., BRAL, in which the petitioner was a partner.

The IBBI found the petitioner guilty of charges and suspended the petitioner’s registration for two years. The petitioner filed an instant writ petition to set aside the order of suspension of registration.

It was noted that the petitioner had appointed BRAL to provide support services in the liquidation process of the corporate debtor, in which the petitioner was a partner. Thus, it was a calculated attempt on the part of the petitioner to get more fees.

High Court Held

The High Court noted that where the liquidator appointed BRAL, a firm in which he was a partner, to provide support services and allowed the said firm to raise bills higher than the fee of the liquidator himself, an act of the liquidator was contrary to the intent of liquidation process.

The High Court held that the factual motive of the petitioner behind appointing BRAL was to increase his fee by circumventing Regulation 4 of the Liquidation Regulations.

Further, since the petitioner’s guilt of paying an excess fee to a support service, in which the petitioner himself was a partner, did not warrant any interference, the instant Court was not inclined to set aside the order suspending the petitioner’s registration.

List of Cases Reviewed

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied