HC Sets Aside Order Confirming Demand as SCN Didn’t Specify Date, Time, and Venue for Personal Hearing
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 25 September, 2024
Case Details: Phuljhora Agro Plantation (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India - [2024] 166 taxmann.com 148 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Kausik Chandra, J.
-
Himangshu Kr. Ray, Subhasis Podder, Abhilash Mittal for the Petitioner.
-
Subir Kumar Saha, Rima Sarkar for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, a show cause notice (SCN) was issued to the petitioner under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, seeking a response within thirty days from the date of the notice. The petitioner failed to respond and the department issued an assessment order under Section 73(9) of the Act confirming a demand of Rs. 18,54,576/-. It filed writ petition against the assessment order and contended that it was not afforded a proper opportunity for a hearing by the authority.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the SCN indicated that an opportunity for a hearing might be provided, however it failed to specify any date, time, or venue for the hearing. The assessment was based on a show cause notice denying the petitioner the right to a personal hearing. Therefore, the proceedings based on the defective show cause notice must go. Thus, it was held that the SCN as well as impugned order confirming demand was to be set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied