HC Set-aside Order Passed by GST Officer as Assessee Was Unaware of Proceedings & Matter Was Remanded for Reconsideration
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 May, 2024
Case Details: Nagaraj Sangiah v. Superintendent of GST & Central Excise (Grp-IV) - [2024] 162 taxmann.com 301 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
- B. Sivaraman for the Petitioner.
- Rajinish Pathyil, Sr. SC for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a trader and it received notice from the GST department for difference between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B and also for auto populated GSTR-2A. The petitioner didn’t participate in the proceedings and the department passed an order-in-original (OIO) against the petitioner. It filed writ petition against the OIO and contended that it was unaware of proceedings culminating in impugned order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the impugned order was passed on the ground that the petitioner had not participated in the proceedings. Therefore, it would be just and necessary that the petitioner would be provided an opportunity to contest the tax demand by putting the petitioner on terms.
Thus, the Court held that the impugned order was to be set aside on condition that the petitioner remitted an aggregate sum of Rs. 15,00,000 towards the disputed tax demand within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Court also directed the department to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh order within three months.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied