HC Remanded Matter Since Dept. Disallowed ITC for Not Showing Bank Payment Proof of Invoices Without Demanding It
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 26 April, 2024
Case Details: Amit Upadhyay (Proprietor of Gayatari Diamonds) v. Sales Tax Officer - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 676 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sanjeev Sachdeva & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Puneet Rai & Kapil Sharma, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC & Ms Samridhi Vats, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner received a show cause notice proposing a demand for “excess claim ITC and ITC claimed from cancelled dealers, return defaulters and tax non-payers”. It submitted detailed reply but the department disallowed input tax credit as petitioner not shown bank payment proof of invoices and the demand was confirmed. It filed writ petition against the demand order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner had submitted a detailed reply responding to each of the points raised. The Court also noted that the department issued reminder letter to petitioner and opportunity to personally appear was given. However, there was no requirement stipulated in letter to produce any bank payment proofs.
The Court also noted that the petitioner was ready to produce all proofs of payments made through bank channel. Therefore, it was held that the impugned order was to be set aside and matter to be remanded. The Court also directed the petitioner to produce all the relevant documents before the proper officer.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied