HC Remanded Matter for Re-Adjudication Since Assessee Was Unaware of SCN Due to Non-Access of GST Portal After Closing Business
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 3 July, 2024
Case Details: Swastik Enterprises v. Union of India - [2024] 162 taxmann.com 536 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Sanjeev Sachdeva & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Vineet Bhatia, Aamnaya Jagannath Mishra, Keshav Garg & Bipin, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Kshitij Chhabra, Sr. Panel Counsel, Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC & Ms Samridhi Vats, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner had closed his business in 2020 and it did not check the GST portal. The department issued show cause notice (SCN) proposing demand but the SCN was uploaded only on the portal and was not communicated to the petitioner through any other means. Consequently, the petitioner was not able to furnish a reply against the impugned SCN and ex-parte order was passed by the department.
The petitioner filed writ petition and contended that it was unaware of any proceedings initiated against it and the demand was raised without providing an opportunity to file reply.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the impugned order was passed and it was mentioned in the order that another opportunity to submit reply for the sake of natural justice opportunity for Personal Hearing, as per provisions of Section 75(4) of CGST Act, was also provided to the taxpayer by issuing “REMINDER” though the GST portal. However, the petitioner did not access the portal due to closure of business and could not reply to the said Show Cause Notice.
Therefore, the Court held that since the only reason for passing the impugned order was that petitioner had not filed any reply/explanation, one opportunity needs to be granted to the petitioner to respond to the Show Cause Notice and the matter was liable to be remitted to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied