HC Remanded Matter for Fresh Consideration Since Order Wrongly Confirmed Previously Dropped Amounts
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 7 August, 2024
Case Details: Jesus Ginning and Raymond Seeds v. Superintendent of GST & Central Excise* [2024] 163 taxmann.com 687 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- C. Saravanan, J.
- A. Satheesh Murugan for the Petitioner.
- R. Nandhakumar, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was earlier issued with a notice whereby it was called upon to give explanation for the discrepancies between the return filed by the petitioner in Form GSTR-1 and in Form GSTR-3B. The petitioner replied to the same & demand was dropped. Thereafter, another notice was issued which was not replied by petitioner and the department passed order confirming demands including previously dropped amount. It filed writ petition and contended that there was violation of principles of natural justice.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner was earlier issued a notice for discrepancies in returns and demand was dropped. Thereafter, the department issued another notice and the petitioner failed to respond. Therefore, the Court held that the department cannot be wholly blamed in the facts and circumstances of the case.
However, the amount which was dropped in the earlier proceedings was also confirmed and there was non-application of mind on this aspect. Thus, the Court held that the impugned order to be set aside and the case was remitted back to the department to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. The Court also directed the petitioner to deposit 10% of the disputed tax.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied