HC Remanded Matter as AO Failed to Consider Evidence That Invoice Value for Medicines Didn’t Include Taxes
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 10 September, 2024
Case Details: Erode Medical Centre v. State Tax Officer-2 [2024] 164 taxmann.com 680 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
- G. Natrajan for the Petitioner.
- C. Harsha Raj, Addl. Govt. Pleader (T), for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in providing health services and had received intimation and show cause notice from the department. It submitted reply but the department issued order under Section 76 demanding tax on alleged collection and non-remittance. It filed writ petition against the demand order and contended that the department failed to consider materials placed on record.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the first tax proposal related to the alleged collection of taxes by the petitioner in respect of sale of medicines and non-remittance thereof to the Government. The petitioner submitted that no representation, express or implied, was made in invoices to the effect that the invoice value includes tax. The Court also noted that the second issue related to tax on premises owned by the petitioner but the reply in respect thereof was not taken into consideration.
The Court further noted that the legal issue as to whether an implied representation would be sufficient for purposes of sub-section (1) of Section 76 is also an aspect to be considered. Therefore, the Court held that the matter required reconsideration and the Court directed the department to issue fresh order after giving reasonable opportunity and personal hearing to assessee.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied