HC Rejects Writ Plea for Restoration of Struck-Off Name by RoC | Directs Petitioner to NCLT Under Co(s) Act, 2013

  • Blog|News|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 3 August, 2024

Restoration of Struck-Off Name by RoC

Case Details: Karmyogi Builders (P.) Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies - [2024] 165 taxmann.com 52 (HC-Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Dharmesh Sharma, J.
  • Trideep Pais, Sr. Adv. for the Petitioner.
  • Ms Shiva LakshmiRajdeep SarafAnoushka BajpaiBineesh K., Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the Registrar of Companies (RoC) struck off the name of the petitioner company from the register of companies on its failure to file statutory returns from 1996 onwards.

During the course of the proceeding, the writ court directed the name of the petitioner to be restored subject to payment of costs and on the condition that the company files its pending annual returns as well as balance sheets.

Pursuant thereto, the petitioner deposited the cost, and consequently, the RoC restored the name of the company, changing its status from inactive to active. Even after passing the said order, the petitioner had not been able to file its return due to certain inter se disputes amongst directors and/or shareholders.

The RoC proceeded to strike the petitioner’s name from the register of companies in the exercise of its powers under section 248(5) of the Companies Act, 2013.

The petitioner filed an instant writ seeking directions to the writ court to issue appropriate directions to the RoC to accept the delayed statutory returns sought to be filed and also revive/relist the petitioner company.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the provisions under which action was earlier taken under the old Act, as also the action subsequently taken under the new Act, are not inconsistent with one another. The new enactment rather provides for a more detailed procedure for striking off the name of a company as also an effective remedy for dealing with the de-registration of a company, which is not running its business or in operation. Further, the registers maintained under the old Act are also deemed to be registers maintained under the new Act and can be relied upon for seeking any legal remedy.

In view of the foregoing discussion, the remedy of the petitioner lies with the NCLT in terms of chapter XXVII of the newly enacted Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the instant application moved by the petitioner was to be dismissed.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied