HC Dismissed Writ Petition Against Summons Issued by CGST Authority Where SGST Authority Already Initiated Proceedings

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 23 March, 2024

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Interim Moratorium Barred Continuation of Proceedings u/s 138 of NI Act Against Petitioner Due to IBC’s Overriding Effect | HC

Blog, News, FEMA & Banking

Borrower’s Right to Redeem Secured Asset Ends on Publication of Notice u/s 9(1) of SI Rules, Not After Sale Completion | SC

Latest from Taxmann

CGST summons

Case Details: Rais Khan v. Add. Commissioner, Enforcement Wing-II, Rajasthan - [2024] 160 taxmann.com 546 (Rajasthan)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Pankaj Bhandari & Mrs. Shubha Mehta, JJ.
    • Prabhansh Sharma for the Petitioner.
    • Bharat Vyas, AAG (Sr. Adv.), Ms Pratyushi Mehta, Ajay Shukla and Raghav Sharma for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner was issued summons by the DGGI under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017. It filed writ petition and contended that State Authorities had already initiated proceedings and as per Section 6(2)(b), if a proper officer under SGST Act, 2017 had initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by proper officer under CGST Act, 2017 on same subject matter.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that in the instant case, the petitioner had already filed writ petition against the notice issued by State Authorities and had not put in appearance before the State Authorities. The Court further noted that the scope of Section 6(2)(b) and Section 70 is different and distinct as former deals with any proceedings on subject matter whereas latter deals with power to issue summon in an inquiry.

Therefore, the words ‘proceedings’ and ‘inquiry’ cannot be mixed up to read as if there is a bar for department to invoke power under Section 70. Thus, it was held that summons issued under Section 70 was not hit by Section 6(2)(b) and the petition was liable to be dismissed.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied