HC Directs Appellate Authority to Consider Appeal on Merits as There Was Delay of Only 9 Days in Filing Appeal
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 September, 2024
Case Details: G.R. Megaa Engineering v. Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) - [2024] 166 taxmann.com 167 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Senthilkumar, J.
- A. Chandrasekaran for the Petitioner.
- Mrs K.Vasanthamala, GA (T) for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was issued notice for belated filing of annual return in Form GSTR-9. The proceedings culminated in an order dated 18.08.2023. The petitioner filed appeal against the order but the appeal was rejected on the ground that the appeal was beyond the condonable period under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. It filed writ petition against the rejection of appeal.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner presented the appeal on 26.12.2023 and the condonable period lapsed on 17.12.2023. The period of delay beyond the condonable period was only nine days. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner stated that the papers were handed over to the accountant for filing the appeal and that the petitioner was not well during the relevant period. Immediately upon recovery, the petitioner contacted the auditor and came to know that the appeal had not been filed.
Thus, the Court held that these facts and circumstances justified the consideration of the petitioner’s appeal on merits. Therefore, the Court directed the Appellate Authority to receive and dispose of the petitioner’s appeal on merits, without going into question of limitation, provided such appeal was re-presented within ten days from date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied