GST ITC not available on demo cars being not purchased with intention of further supply: AAAR
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 31 May, 2022
Case Details: Platinum Motocorp LLP, In re - [2022] 138 taxmann.com 344 (AAAR-Haryana)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Shekhar Vidyarthi & Suresh Kishnani, Member
- Deepak Juneja, Adv. for the Applicant.
Facts of the Case
The Appellant is an authorised dealer of Maruti Suzuki India Limited. The appellant purchases ‘Demo Cars’ for demonstration purposes. Each demo car is used for demonstration for a maximum period of 2 years from the date of purchase after which it can be sold as a second-hand car. The appellant reached out to the Haryana AAAR for the following issues:
(a) Whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be availed on the demo cars
(b) Whether ITC can be availed on ancillary input services such as insurance and repair and maintenance availed in respect of demo cars
AAAR Held
The Haryana AAAR observed that Section 17(5)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 provides that ITC cannot be allowed on motor vehicles with a seating capacity of up to 13 persons when used for other than the intended purposes. The intended purposes are limited to the following:
(a) Further supply of such motor vehicles; or
(b) Transportation of passengers; or
(c) Imparting training on driving such motor vehicles
It was observed that the demo vehicles are used for the purpose of demonstration to prospective customers for 2 years or so and therefore, afterwards, it loses the character of the new vehicle. These vehicles are then sold akin to second-hand goods. The demo vehicles are not meant for ‘further supply of such motor vehicles’, but are first put to the mentioned uses. The AAAR provided that if the contentions of the applicant are allowed then in that case all the motor vehicles, irrespective of the nature of the supply will be eligible for ITC across the industries.
The AAAR held that the appellant has never received the demo cars with the intent to simply ‘further supply/sell’ as such and therefore, ITC on such vehicles cannot be allowed. Further, ITC on repair/insurance/maintenance used in respect of said vehicles cannot be allowed.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Platinum Motocorp LLP, In re [2021] 124 taxmann.com 460 (AAR – Har.) (para 25) affirmed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied