Goods Can’t Be Detained for Non-Generation of E-Invoice if There Was No Intention To Avoid Tax Payment | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 24 July, 2024
Case Details: Nancy Trading Company v. State of U.P - [2024] 164 taxmann.com 470 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Piyush Agrawal, J.
- Arjit Gupta, Manish Gupta & Naveen Chandra Gupta for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in the business of trading. The goods of petitioner were detained in transit by the department and it was alleged that e-invoice was not generated as per Rule 48 of CGST Rules. The goods were released on payment of tax and penalty and the petitioner filed appeal against the detention order but the same was rejected. It filed writ petition against the demand order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that there was no discrepancy with regard to quality and quantity of goods as mentioned in Tax Invoice, e-waybills, GR’s etc. which were accompanying goods. It was a case of technical error committed by petitioner for not generating e-invoice before movement of goods.
The Court also noted that the limit of annual turnover for issuing e-way bill was reduced w.e.f. 01.08.2022 to Rs. 10 crores and mistake committed by petitioner was bonafide. Therefore, in absence of any specific finding with regard to mens rea for evasion of tax, it was held that the impugned order demanding tax and penalty was liable to be set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied