[FAQs] ICDS and Form 3CD – Reporting | Compliance | Adjustments
- Blog|Tax Audit Week|Account & Audit|
- 6 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 September, 2024
Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) are guidelines issued by the Central Government under Section 145(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to standardise the calculation of taxable income for businesses and individuals. These standards apply to income under' profits and gains of business or profession' and 'income from other sources,' ensuring consistency in tax reporting. ICDS does not impact the maintenance of books of accounts but affects the computation of taxable income reported in Form 3CD, a statement of particulars required under Section 44AB for tax audits. Adjustments per ICDS are disclosed in specific clauses of Form 3CD to reconcile the differences between accounting profits and taxable income. Compliance with ICDS is mandatory for taxpayers using the mercantile system of accounting, with specific exceptions like entities not subject to tax audits or any person opting for presumptive taxation schemes.
FAQ 1. Is Reporting in Form 3CD Based on the Books of Account or Adjusted per the Income Computation & Disclosure Standards (ICDS)?
The ICDS preamble states that these standards apply to the computation of income under ‘profit and gains of business or profession’ or ‘Income from other sources.’ It does not extend to the maintenance of books of accounts. Additionally, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT[1]) has specified that books of account should be maintained according to the accounting policies applicable to the assessee. Therefore, it is evident that reporting in Form 3CD should align with the books of account maintained by the assessee. Any adjustments to profits or losses as per the ICDS should be detailed in Clause 13 of Form 3CD.
For More Details about the ICDS, Visit Taxmann.com/Practice |
FAQ 2. Who Is Required to Comply With ICDS?
Pursuant to the powers granted by Section 145(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Government has notified[2] the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS). These standards are designed to ensure uniform accounting policies for the computation of taxable income under the Income-tax Act and aim to decrease litigation.
All assesses whose income falls under the categories of ‘profit and gains from business or profession’ or ‘Income from other sources,’ or both, must compute their taxable income in accordance with the ICDS. However, adherence to the ICDS is required only if the assessee uses the ‘Mercantile system’ of accounting.
There are no minimum limits on turnover or taxable income for the enforcement of ICDS; therefore, every assessee generating business or residual income must comply with ICDS in determining their income. Nonetheless, the application of ICDS is subject to certain exceptions.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has clarified[3] that ICDS’s general rules are applicable to all entities, including banks, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), and insurance companies, unless overridden by sector-specific provisions in the ICDS or the Act itself. For instance, ICDS-VIII includes particular guidelines for banks and certain financial institutions regarding securities, while Schedule I of the Act lays down distinct rules for the insurance sector.
Exception 1 – Exemption to Individual or HUF not Liable for Tax Audit
An individual or Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) not mandated to audit their books of account for the previous year under section 44AB is exempt from adhering to the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS).
Additionally, those choosing a presumptive taxation scheme are not obligated to maintain or audit their books, according to ICDS. However, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has clarified [4] that certain ICDS provisions still apply to entities other than individuals or HUFs that opt for this scheme. For example, when calculating presumptive income for a partnership firm under section 44AD, ICDS rules related to construction contracts or revenue recognition must be used to assess receipts or turnover.
Exception 2 – Exemption for MAT Computation
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has clarified [5] that the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) are relevant for calculating income according to the standard provisions of the Act. However, for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), which is calculated based on ‘book profit’—net profit as outlined in the Profit and Loss Account prepared in accordance with the Companies Act, with specific adjustments—ICDS does not apply. Conversely, in cases where an assessee is subject to the Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) under Section 115JC, ICDS are applicable. The computation of AMT involves adjusting the total income, as calculated under the regular tax provisions, according to specified adjustments outlined in the Act.
FAQ 3. Is an Adjustment Necessary in the P&L Account for ICDS Adjustments?
Clause 13(d) mandates that the tax auditor indicate whether any adjustments are needed to the profits or losses to conform to the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS). If the response to clause 13(d) is yes, then the required adjustments for each specific ICDS must be clearly detailed. These adjustments are solely for the purpose of computing taxable income and should not result in any corresponding changes to the financial statements prepared according to the Accounting Standards or Ind AS.
FAQ 4. How to Calculate the Profit Changes Resulting From Compliance With ICDS-IV?
Clause 13(e) of Form 3CD requires disclosure of any increase or decrease in profits resulting from the application of ICDS. To compute the revised profits in accordance with ICDS IV, follow the specified method. The final outcome from this calculation should be reported in the mentioned clause:
Accounting Standards (AS) – Reconciliation
Particulars | Amount |
Profit before tax as per AS financials
Add: Income taxable (if not credited to P&L account)
Less: Income not taxable (if already credited to P&L account)
|
***
*** *** *** *** (***) (***) (***) (***) |
Net Profit/Loss Before Tax as per ICDS | *** |
Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) – Reconciliation
Particulars | Amount |
Profit before tax as per Ind AS financials
Add: Income taxable (if not credited to P&L account)
Less: Income not taxable (if already credited to P&L account)
|
***
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** (***) (***) (***) (***) (***) (***) |
Net Profit/Loss Before Tax as per ICDS | *** |
* Generally, industry practice is to book such interest only when it is received. So, this item may not be a reconciling item in some of the cases.
Note – The reconciliation shall be done with respect to every ICDS.
For Reconciliation Related to Different ICDS, Visit Taxmann.com/Practice |
FAQ 5. Clause 13(d) Requires Details of the Adjustment to Be Made for Complying With the ICDS. Should Such Adjustments Be Entered Separately for Income Taxable Under the Head “PGBP” and Income Taxable Under the Head “Other Sources”?
According to the requirements, the tax auditor should record a consolidated figure reflecting the total increase or decrease in profit. There is no need to separate these adjustments into different income categories.
[1] Circular No. 10/2017, dated 23-03-2017
[2] Notification No. 87/2016, dated 29-9-2016
[3] Circular No. 10/2017, dated 23-03-2017
[4] Circular No. 10/2017, dated 23-03-2017
[5] Circular No. 10/2017, dated 23-03-2017
Dive Deeper:
[FAQs] Tax Audit Requirements – Section 44AB | Presumptive Taxation | Key Forms – A.Y. 2024-25
[FAQs] Essential Tax Audit Report Compliance – Deadline | Procedure | Penalties – A.Y. 2024-25
[FAQs] How to Calculate Gross Receipts and Sales Turnover for Tax Audits – A Detailed FAQ Guide
[FAQs] Method of Accounting | GST | Ind AS under Tax Audit – Ensuring Effective Tax Audit Compliance
[FAQs] Disclosures and Reporting in Form 3CD under Tax Audit
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied