Dept. Should Provide Reasonable Opportunity of Hearing to Petitioner Who Was Unaware of Proceedings | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 26 July, 2024
Case Details: Tvl. Samikannu Mariappan v. State Tax Officer - [2024] 164 taxmann.com 275 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
- Mrs P. Jayalakshmi for the Petitioner.
- V. Prashanth Kiran, Government Advocate (Taxes) for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was an octogenarian and he had entrusted GST compliances to a local auditor. An order in original was passed against the petitioner and he filed writ petition to challenge the same. He submitted that he was unaware of these proceedings until he received a letter.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the tax proposal was arrived at on best judgment basis because the petitioner did not respond to the notice or appear at the personal hearing. Since the petitioner was not heard before the order was issued and he asserts that he was unaware of proceedings, the interest of justice warrants reconsideration albeit by putting the petitioner on terms.
Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was to be set aside on condition that assessee remits 10% of disputed tax demand. The Court also directed the department to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh order within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the petitioner’s reply.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied