Dept. Can’t Raise Demand of Interest on Delayed Furnishing of Return Without Initiating Any Adjudication Proceedings | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 4 May, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: East India Udyog Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand - [2024] 162 taxmann.com 106 (Jharkhand)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Shree Chandrashekhar, ACJ. and Navneet Kumar, J.
- Ms Amrita Sinha & Rohit Ranjan Singh, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Ashok Kr. Yadav, Anish Kr. Mishra & Ms Surabhi for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in business of manufacturing various types of power distribution transformers, conductors and cables. There was some delay in filing of return for period from June 2018 to March 2019 and the department issued notice for the payment of interest on account of delayed filing of the return. The petitioner received a notice and a demand of interest was made without any adjudication. It filed writ petition against the demand of interest and contended that the recovery proceeding under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 could not be initiated without a final adjudication.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that as per Section 73, the proper officer shall issue the notice at least three months prior to the time-limit specified for issuance of order. In the instant case, there was no adjudication before a demand for the payment of interest was raised because of the delayed filing of the returns. Therefore, it was held that without initiating any adjudication proceedings under section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act 2017, where liability had been disputed, the department could not raise a demand for payment of interest on delayed furnishing of return. The Court also noted that the time for filing of return was extended by the Government. Thus, the impugned orders were liable to be set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
