Demand of Interest on Delayed Payment of Tax Set Aside as Revenue Failed to Provide Reasons for Rejecting Assessee’s Claim
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 August, 2024
Case Details: Lids Advertisers v. Deputy State Tax Officer - [2024] 163 taxmann.com 587 (Kerala)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Murali Purushothaman, J.
- R. Sreejith, K. Krishna, Achyuth Menon & Padmanathan K. V., Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, Adv., Smt. Jasmin, G.P. & T.C. Krishna, Senior Panel Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was registered under the CGST Act, 2017. The GSTR-3B returns for the month of December 2017 to March 2018 were filed as ‘NIL’ due to an inadvertent error. The department issued notice and the petitioner submitted that GSTR-3B returns were erroneously filed as ‘NIL’ due to inadvertent error despite tax being paid within prescribed time. However, the department issued orders demanding interest on alleged delayed payment of tax. It filed writ petition against the demand order and contended that interest should not be demanded.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner had submitted that tax for all the aforesaid months had been paid within the time provided as per Section 39(7) of the Act. However, the department failed to provide reasons for rejecting petitioner’s reply claiming timely payment.
The Court also noted that when a show cause notice is issued and a reply is submitted, the authority issuing the show cause notice shall record the reason as to why the reply is not acceptable. Therefore, it was held that the impugned orders were set aside for violation of principles of natural justice and the matter was directed for fresh consideration after giving opportunity to assessee.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied