Assessment Order to Be Set Aside Since Tables of SCN Itself Were Contradictory & Reply Wasn’t Considered | HC

  • News|Blog|GST & Customs|
  • < 1 minute
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 30 March, 2024

Recent Posts

Blog, News, GST & Customs

Bail Granted Due to Investigation Lapses in Issuing Fake Invoices Under GST | HC

News, Blog, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Delisting of Equity Shares Under Approved Resolution Plan Would Be Governed by IBC; Overrides SEBI Delisting Norms | HC

Latest from Taxmann

GST Assessment Order

Case Details: Ambika Stores v. Deputy State Tax Officer-I - [2024] 160 taxmann.com 433 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
    • B. Raveendran for the Petitioner.
    • Mrs K. Vasanthamala, GA (T) for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner was a registered person under GST. It received a show cause notice (SCN) alleging discrepancy between the GSTR-3B return and GSTR-1 return and also between the GSTR-3B return and GSTR-2A auto populated return. It submitted a reply to the said notice and pointed out contradiction between figures set out in two tables in SCN. However, the department passed an assessment order without considering its reply and it filed writ petition against the same.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that the SCN was contradictory since in first table, CGST and SGST amounts in GSTR-3B were shown as Rs.3.33 lakhs, whereas in second table dealing with difference between GSTR-3B return and auto populated GSTR-2A return, GSTR-3B amounts were specified as Rs.5.19 lakhs both for CGST and SGST.

In addition, it appeared from perusal of assessment order that reply of assessee was not considered in assessment order. Therefore, the Court held that the impugned assessment order was liable to be set aside. However, it was open for authorities to issue fresh SCN.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied