Application for Cancellation of GST Registration Can’t Be Rejected Merely on Ground of Pendency of DRC-01 Proceedings | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 19 April, 2024
Case Details: Chetan Garg v. Avato Ward 105 State Goods and Service Tax - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 468 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sanjeev Sachdeva & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Anurag Rajput, Sahil Puri, Sahib Rajput & Dhruv Bhardwaj, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC, Prateek Badhwar, Ms Shaguftha H. Badhwar & Ms Samridhi Vats, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner filed an application for cancellation of registration on the ground that he did not intend to carry on the business under the said GST number. A query was raised on the said application and petitioner had duly responded to the said query. However, the application for cancellation was rejected due to pendency of the proceedings under DRC-01.
Thereafter, he filed writ petition and sought direction to cancel GST registration and it was contended that merely pendency of the DRC-01 could not be a ground to decline the request of the tax-payer for cancellation of the GST Registration.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the proceedings under DRC-01 are independent of the proceedings for cancellation of GST Registration and can continue despite cancellation of GST registration. The recovery of any amount found due can always be made irrespective of the status of the registration.
Thus, it was held that merely pendency of the DRC-01 can’t be a ground to decline the request of the tax-payer for cancellation of the GST Registration. Therefore, the Court directed that the GST Registration of the petitioner shall be treated to be cancelled with effect from date from which he sought cancellation of GST registration.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied