Appellate Authority Should Entertain Appeal of Assessee Who Failed to Attend Hearing as His Residence Was Shifted | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 25 April, 2024
Case Details: Johnson Bevisedmond v. Joint Commissioner of GST & Central Excise - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 632 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Krishnan Ramasamy, J.
- G. Derrick Sam for the Petitioner.
- K. Mohanamurali, Sr. Standing counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner is an individual and he received notice from the GST department for personal hearing. He was not able to appear for the aforesaid personal hearing. Thereafter, the department passed the order. He filed writ petition and contended that only two opportunities were provided to him and the impugned order has been passed by the department in violation of principles of natural justice.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that petitioner was provided two opportunities of personal hearings but he couldn’t attend hearing as his residence was shifted. Now, the petitioner was intended to file the appeal and it would be appropriate to grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority. Therefore, the Court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority by filing the appeal within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied