AO is to Hold Personal Hearing in Designated Area of Tax Office If Video Conference Facility is Not Available | HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 July, 2024
Case Details: Fusion Granito (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT - [2024] 164 taxmann.com 5 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Bhargav D. Karia & Niral R. Mehta, JJ.
- B.S. Soparkar for the Petitioner.
- Karan G. Sanghani for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny, and an assessment order was passed. After that, revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263, and an assessment order was set aside. The Assessee requested a personal hearing.
However, revenue denied the same on the grounds that a personal hearing through videoconferencing was not possible. The assessment order was passed without providing the assessee with the opportunity, and additions were made under section 68. The assessee filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the AO passed the assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 263 without providing the opportunity of personal hearing in violation of the principle of natural justice.
As per the provisions of section 144B of the Income Tax Act and Circular No. 06.09.2021 issued by the CBDT, the AO is required to give a personal hearing through video conference. If the facility is unavailable, the personal hearing is to be conducted in a designated area in the Income Tax Office, and the proceedings are to be recorded.
Therefore, the AO’s contention that there needed to be functionality to conduct hearings through video conferences cannot be accepted. Not providing the opportunity of hearing to the assessee, though required as per the provisions of section 144B, was a breach of the principle of natural justice.
Accordingly, the matter was remanded to the AO to give the assessee an opportunity to be heard either through video conference or through a personal hearing in the designated area of the income tax office.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied