AO Can’t Hold That Reply of SCN Was Insufficient Without Examining Documents Submitted by Assessee | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 7 May, 2024
Case Details: A. B. Traders v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 260 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sanjeev Sachdeva & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Rajesh Mahna, Ramanand Roy, Mithlesh Kumar Tiwari, Mayank Kouts, Shiva Narang & Silky Wadhwa, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Rajiv Aggarwal, ASC & Ms Samridhi Vats, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in trading business. The department issued a show cause notice (SCN) proposing a demand and it filed a detailed reply. But the proper officer passed an order and recorded that the reply uploaded by the taxpayer was insufficient and unsatisfactory. It filed writ petition against the order and contended that the proper officer did not consider the reply submitted by the petitioner in full consideration.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the impugned order did not specifically deal with the reply of the petitioner, however, the proper officer referred to certain judgments to hold that burden to prove admissibility of any input tax credit could not be shifted to tax authorities. The proper officer was required to examine documents submitted by the petitioner and then hold whether input tax credit was admissible or not. But, in the present case, the proper officer had not stated why such transactions were not acceptable. Therefore, it was held that the impugned order was to be set aside and matter was to be remitted to proper officer for re-adjudication.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied